suffer loss.Failure to give proper investment advices on generally accepted professional standards, guarantee returns from investment and failure to carry out order of the client were in violation of the
securities trading decisions on behalf of client was in violation of the Notifications of Capital Market Supervisory Board concerning personnel in the capital market*, the SEC therefore suspended Atthapol from
number of clients? securities trading orders. Such actions were in violation of Clauses 23(1) and 23(3) of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 8/2557 Re: Rules on
accounts. The acts of {A} {B} and {C} were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the
. The act of {A} was in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The acts
rules. Bee was earlier found purchasing EIC shares through the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) at a price higher than the tender offer price. His action resulted in a violation of the tender offer rules
of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official
acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry
District, Songkla Province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Marupong signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract