District, Songkla Province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Marupong signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract
. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the
Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition
acts of Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In
baht to four nominees through its subsidiary, SECC Holding, causing damage to both companies. Their misconducts were in violation of Sections 307, 308, 311, 313, 315, 89/7 and 89/24 of the SEA, as the
derivatives trading or guilty of deception, fraud or dishonesty, or having been fined for such violations; (c) having been named in any complaint relating to violation under sub clause (b) by financial
shareholders. Damages accrue to the shareholders. 12 REFORM PRIORITIES IN ASIA: TAKING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TO A HIGHER LEVEL © OECD 2011 members and key executives for breach of their duties, failure to comply
unprofessional and dishonest acts. Her actions were in violation of Clause 14(1) and (2) of the Notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission No. SorKhor. 49/2552 Re: Approval for Investor
and the persons from (3) to (7) were in violation of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2), and liable to the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act