District, Songkla Province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Marupong signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment by IEC even though the construction was in breach of the contract

. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the

. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition, the

Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In addition

acts of Mr. Amorn and Mr. Pipat were deemed a dishonest breach of duties offense, an asset misappropriation and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves and their associates, causing damage to AJA. In

the cancelation of the power plant project. These actions rendered the conditions unfeasible, resulting in total damages of 156.8 million baht to IEC. The actions of these four individuals were a breach

the cancelation of the power plant project. These actions rendered the conditions unfeasible, resulting in total damages of 156.8 million baht to IEC. The actions of these four individuals were a breach

the cancelation of the power plant project. These actions rendered the conditions unfeasible, resulting in total damages of 156.8 million baht to IEC. The actions of these four individuals were a breach

breach of duty through fraudulent conduct, misappropriation of assets, and seeking unlawful benefits for themselves or others, causing harm to IEC. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry

derivatives trading or guilty of deception, fraud or dishonesty, or having been fined for such violations; (c) having been named in any complaint relating to violation under sub clause (b) by financial