into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the
statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
Capital Market Supervisory Board. On August 10, 2018, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 247 and 298 of the SEC Act conjunction. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the court