, 2010, which has caused the termination of Mr. Somchit?s directorship and executive position at SINGHA in accordance with Sections 89/4 and 89/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992

matched to benefit the same persons, which is liable to contravention of Section 243 (1) (2) and Section 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 and Sections 83 and 86 of the Criminal Code, as the

prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions, violated Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and

in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The Supreme Court sentenced the accused to 1-year imprisonment and pay a total fine of Baht 1,000,000 for violating Sections 281/2 paragraph 2 of the

Criminal Code. If the defendant failed to pay the fine, enforcement shall proceed in accordance with Sections 29 and 30 of the Criminal Code. DAB Act S.94 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official

rose more than 15 times, from 0.5 million to 8.47 million shares.The actions of the persons above are deemed SCN share price manipulation offenses under Section 244/3, in conjunction with Sections 244

trading. The aforesaid actions of Shine were in contravention of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code

considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others, in violation of Sections 307, 308, 311, and 313 of the said Act.     Consequently, Yongyuth, Vacharee, Suchit, Nitaya and Suttirat

and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 5) B.E. 2559 (2016). In the case of Usuma and Thitirat, their acts are liable to be the offenses under the aforesaid Sections in conjunction

, which may lead to imprisonment from 5 to 10 years and a double fine based on the asset value or the benefit received from violation of such sections, as the case may be, but in any case not less than