operating activities of BLISS. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 238 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), the Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine on him in the amount

? futures trading orders through an account linked to him at another broker for his personal gain.  This caused financial damages to his clients. His actions were in violation of Sections 145(3) and (4) of

information to trade securities for his own and others? benefits  in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the

dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section

violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The above persons, named in the criminal complaint filed by the SEC, are deemed as having untrustworthy

with the SEC, thus causing it to be an unapproved share offering.NEWS private placement without the SEC approval was in violation of Section 33 and liable to the penalties under Section 268 of the

later disclosed to the public in the evening of February 28, 2014.The use of inside information to trade securities to gain unfair benefits over other investors is in violation of Section 241 of the

violation of law or relevant regulations is found or false information is disclosed or material information is concealed, the SEC would be able to take further action by virtue of the Securities Law.     The

traded on the SET, was in violation of Section 239 and liable to the penalites under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was imposed a criminal fine of 500,000 baht

being traded in great volume and the price was changing inconsistently with normal market conditions, to lure the public into trading such shares.   Somchai?s offense was in violation of Section 243 (1