Novermber at 17.41 hours (after SET closing). His misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).
imposed a fine until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following
until Satang Corporation Company Limited shall improve and correct the violation properly. However, the mentioned amount of fines does not include daily fines starting from the day following the
any way. The SEC has considered that Pongsak’s misconduct of performing duties irresponsibly without professional due care is in violation of Clause 23(2) and he is deemed to have the prohibited
imprisonment and fine penalty. In case of an act liable to violation of other laws, SEC will cooperate with relevant agencies for further proceedings. ________________________
Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) may be subject to legal action under such relevant laws, with both imprisonment and fine penalty. In case of an act liable to violation of
violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee fined {A} 2,580,211.77 baht, {B} 2,948,813.46 baht and
into the trading. The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction
orders and payment. The said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee