deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and a fine of 100,000 Baht. As the defendant had no prior criminal record involving imprisonment, the Court suspended the execution of the imprisonment sentence for a
, resulting in a sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and a fine of 100,000 Baht. As the defendant had no prior criminal record involving imprisonment, the Court suspended the execution of the imprisonment
, violating Section 301. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to one-year imprisonment. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
173,000 baht. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 02/12/2003
Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank
Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting
Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting
Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank