Bangkok, August 19, 2011 ? Vasant Thienhom, SEC Deputy Secretary-General stated concerning the Appeal Court?s today judgment that overturned the Court of First Instance on December 3, 2007 that
deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and a fine of 100,000 Baht. As the defendant had no prior criminal record involving imprisonment, the Court suspended the execution of the imprisonment sentence for a
final judgment in the case not filed by the SEC Office and it has not yet surpassed the three-year interval time after either the person completed the term of imprisonment or the suspension of sentence
, resulting in a sentence of imprisonment for 1 year and a fine of 100,000 Baht. As the defendant had no prior criminal record involving imprisonment, the Court suspended the execution of the imprisonment
judgment regardless of whether the sentence has been suspended and have been discharged for a period of less than three years after being sentenced in the offences under law on securities and exchange or law
conviction into half without suspension of sentence. ? Sondhi was sentenced to 85 year imprisonment for 17 counts at five years each. The court halved his jail term to 42 years and six months.? Suradet was
imprisonment by the court’s final judgment following the criminal complaint initiated by such regulatory body, regardless of with or without the court’s order of suspension of sentence, except in the cases where
/ASEANCollectiveInvestmentSchemes.aspx English (United States) SharePO after either the person completed the term of imprisonment or the suspension of sentence period ended. Having been subject to the court's order of asset seizure