purchased for herself. She admitted to the client in the said conversation that she sold the client?s securities. Using the client?s account for her own securities trading and illegal use of the client?s

admitted that the client, at the beginning, had authorized him to make securities and derivatives trading decisions on her behalf. Also, the recorded conversation found later indicated that the client

derivatives trading orders on behalf of a client. She admitted making trading decisions and sometimes submitting internet trading orders on behalf of the client. Moreover, {B} and Kantanapat, the securities

for a certain period of time and with high trading volume. Moreover, {A} admitted that he traded securities for a client without any order. Although this client notified him to stop trading, {A

approximately 600,000 ? 700,000 baht. Since then, his client told him to stop trading, but he traded again on January 5-6, 2012. Theera admitted he had traded derivatives for his client during aforementioned

him to stop trading, but he traded again on January 5-6, 2012. {A} admitted he had traded derivatives for his client during aforementioned period and also made trading decisions during January 5-6, 2012

misconduct of which he had previously committed. He admitted receiving the client's trading orders through LINE Application and mobile phone from time to time, after that he called the client to confirm the

, she informed her client of the submission of trading orders to rectify trading orders of another person sent through incorrect type of account. Also, {A} admitted that she received trading orders from

her client to buy derivative warrant without informing the client of specific risk of securities, the securities? last trading date and maturity date. {A} admitted that she advised the client to buy

client and caused such client to suffer loss. In addition, most trading transactions had no source of orders. {A} admitted that the client allowed him to sell the securities in cases of making profit or