judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange
Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act of 1992
ruled against the accused for violating Sections 90, 289 of the SEC Act and Section 83 of the Criminal Code. Since the accused pleaded guilty, the court sentenced the accused to imprisonment for a term of
violating Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both
. If any actions are found to be in violation of the laws enforced by the SEC, legal proceedings may be initiated, which could result in imprisonment and fines. In case of possible legal violations of
., imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000 to 500,000 baht, plus a daily fine of 10,000 baht until the violation ends.The SEC, therefore, filed the criminal complaint against the three
violation of Section 243 (2) and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, i.e., imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine not exceeding twice the
securities business pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. His action was in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289, which are imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years
and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., up to two years? imprisonment or a fine twice the amount of the benefits received or should have