Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06/2010

Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, attempt to

Mr. Todsapon Buachaiyo Mr. Todsapon Buachaiyo failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic

), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. DV Act S.Section 16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 16/08/2017

, as part of the charge.The prosecution has resulted in the aforesaid persons unqualified for holding the positions of director or executive of any issuing or listed company while they are under legal

of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht

everyday starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 30,000 and a

646,500 and a further fine of Baht 1,500 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting

accused to pay a total fine of Baht 1,126,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court

Q3/2015 within the specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 1,126,000 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 each day starting from the next day of prosecution