have been received from committing the offenses.* However, they all refused to comply with the civil sanction, which was deemed an indication of their disagreement to settle the case directly with SEC
-money Laundering Act B.E. 2542, as amended. In any case, filing a criminal complaint is mere commencement of the criminal procedures whereby the consideration of whether any person is guilty is subject
criminal complaint in the STARK case, namely: (1) STARK, (2) Mr. Chanin Yensudchai, (3) Mr. Vonnarat Tangkaravakoon, (4) Mr. Chinawat Assavapokee, (5) Mr. Sathar Chantrasettalead, (6) Mr. Kittisak
auditors on issues and case studies related to the accounting and auditing of IPO and listed companies, featuring presentations by representatives from the SEC. The sessions covered perspectives and
On 10 January 2024, the Central Bankruptcy Court ordered the business rehabilitation of ACAP and designated the company as the plan administrator. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940), the next step is for creditors to submit a request for debt repayment to the official receiver of the Legal Execution Department, within one month from the publication date in the Government Gazette on 12 February 2024. The deadline falls on 12 March 2024.* Missing it could result in the bondholde...
On 10 January 2024, the Central Bankruptcy Court ordered the business rehabilitation of ACAP and designated the company as the plan administrator. Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940), the next step is for creditors to submit a request for debt repayment to the official receiver of the Legal Execution Department, within one month from the publication date in the Government Gazette on 12 February 2024. The deadline falls on 12 March 2024.* Missing it could result in the bondholde...
Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank
Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting
Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting
Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank