thier own benefits, which fraudulently caused damage to PICNI's property, violating Section 307, 308, 311. The Appeal Court sustained the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006
Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting
overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting contract with
overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting contract with
Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank
following information: (1) method of procuring of loan, for instance, applying for a loan from a financial institution or issuing a debenture, etc., in which case the highlight of the material information of
violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the
of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under consideration of the
a violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). In addition, the operation constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. This case is under
into their businesses. The aforesaid act was deemed undertaking derivatives business without license in contravention of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This case is under