judgment amending the Civil Court judgment. The Appeal Court imposed civil sanctions as follows: the payment of a sum of 24,538,815 Baht together with 7.5% per annum interest calculated from such amount
penalty to be imposed on the offender. Appeal Any person who is affected by, and disagrees with, an administrative order has the right to appeal such order. The appeal procedure is provided by the SEC
’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the
Requirements | - |- Online Submission | - |- Standard Practices | - |- Risk Control | - |- Compliance / Internal control | - |- Conflict of interest | - |- Complaint Handling | - |- Information Technology
the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. On June 9, 2011, the accused filed an appeal to the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of
lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of Appeal consideration SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 (1) in conjunction with 244 (1) (2) (3) Civil Action Dated 26/03/2018
filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under an appeal period SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 (1) in conjunction with 244 (1) (2) (3) Civil Action Dated 26/03/2018
suspended for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018
Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal Region I, Dr. Poomsiri Dumrongvute, Lecturer of the Faculty of Law, Chulalongkorn University, and Mr. Jinnah Yamuam, Money and Banking subcommittee member, Thailand
for two years. The later, on February 18, 2020, The Appeal Court reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment and not fines. The case was deemed final. On April 10, 2018, the