strictly monitor and supervise their investment consultants to follow such requirements, the SEC may consider that they have inefficient compliance systems and may pursue further actions.?The trading volume

clients. In this regard, the aforesaid actions are in violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 re: Approval for Personnel of Business

strictly monitor and supervise their investment consultants to follow such requirements, the SEC may consider that they have inefficient compliance systems and may pursue further actions.?The trading volume

providers are still responsible for any actions operated by the outsourced company while the outsourced company must also have the readiness in both personnel and the operating system, and such operation

amend other regulations related to ICO portals’ submission and disclosure of financial statements and actions in case of ICO portals’ failure to comply with governing regulations, to enhance efficiency

trading orders. Failure to do so will therefore result in the SEC's administrative actions. In this regard, the SEC on July 5, 2012 imposed administrative sanction on three investment consultants by

any actions where conflicts of interest may arise, such as soft commission, related party transaction, proprietary trading and staff dealing. In addition, effective risk management system for

to other out-of-control wallets without client’ instructions. That actions incurred losses to others and public in violation of Section 85 of Digital Asset Businesses Law. It also violated Section 87

Department of Special Investigation (DSI) to pursue legal actions against (1) Prachai Leophairatana - Chairman of the Executive Committee of TPIPL rehabilitation Plan Administrator, and (2) Stern Stewart & Co

into the trading.  The actions of Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep were in violation of Sections 243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction