rendered a judgement in the Red Case No. Por. 5396/2562, wherein the defendant was required to pay (1) a civil penalty, 1.25 times the benefits that the defendant received or would have received from
activities with another foreign digital asset trading platform and allowing payment for the transactions made in Thai baht through Prompt Pay and Thai QR. Such provision of services may be deemed the
SET within the specified period. The Criminal Court ordered the defendant to pay a fine of Baht 683,500 and a further fine of Baht 1,000 for each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until
purchase or sell such shares which resulted in the purchase or sale of UMI shares not consistent with the normal market conditions. Failed to pay fines as ordered by the Settlement Committee, the SEC
annual report for the year 2018 (Form 56-2, 2018) to the SEC within the specified period. The Court of Appeal sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 1,431,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 for each
accused to pay a fine of Baht 1,431,000 and a further fine of Baht 500 for each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies for failing to file the audited financial
financial statements for the year 2018 and (2) the annual report for the year 2016 (Form 56-2, 2018) to the SEC within the specified period. The Court of Appeal sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht
statements for Q2/2019 to the SEC within the specified period. The Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 1,739,000. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its