final court judgment on the basis of an offense related to assets particularly due to deceitful, fraudulent or dishonest acts that results in widespread damage, either in accordance with Thai or foreign
that are difficult to detect. For example, (1) fraudulent transactions through a subsidiary located overseas that has obscure business objectives and is hard to inspect, (2) trading transactions and
to 227.9 mil. baht. - Total expenses increased 9% or 20.1 mil. baht to 244.4 mil. baht due to the following: 1) The Company had just detected a fraudulent practice of our credit supervisor and need to
prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions, violated Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of the Securities and
Limited (IFEC), with the Economic Crime Suppression Division of the Royal Thai Police (ECD) for committing dishonest acts to gain unfair advantage for himself or other persons. During the month of December
jointly committing with dishonest intent by authorizing KC to issue bills of exchange (B/E) for sale to a mutual fund of Solaris Asset Management Co., Ltd. which caused the misappropriation of an amount
jointly with Thanjira repaid debt to Tisco Asset Management Co.,Ltd. From the said facts, Surasak was considered as jointly with Thanjira engaging in dishonest conducts. The aforesaid actions were in
Phoncharoensuk jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, committed dishonest converting RICH's property to himself or a third party, and obtained unlawful http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc
value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to TOPLINE or causing themselves or another person to obtain any