approximate total value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to TOPLINE or causing themselves or another person to
value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to TOPLINE or causing themselves or another person to obtain any
six persons caused damage to TOPLINE in approximate total value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to
accounts and documents, and also prepared incorrect accounts with intention to deceive others about those fraudulent actions.Previously, the SEC had received complaint concerning POWER-P?s suspicious
departments hold a workshop, to build a network of law enforcement in the capital market crimes of fraudulent solicitations of digital assets .__________________________________ https://www.sec.or.th/EN/Pages
offence related to property committed with dishonest intent; (3) having been a director, a manager or a person with power of management of a financial institution which had its license revoked, unless an
committed an offense under Section 89/25*, for example, taking the assets of the juristic person with dishonest intent, obtaining unlawful gains which damages the juristic person, or altering, shortening
higher risk level in buying financial products with a higher risk than the client’s risk profile. SEC has considered the case and viewed that Somchai had behaviors with dishonest implication, affecting the