action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
-W1 during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and
during the period that CIG-W1 had high cost and almost expired and eventually were all sold out during low price period. The said actions were in violation of Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act
to disclose IFEC’s default on its bills of exchange, following the SET’s request for clarification on 12 January 2017. Wichai’s actions appear to be intentional causing IFEC to be suspended from
million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to IFEC as well as made false
with the amount of 155 million baht in accounting documents. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and caused damage to
. In addition, ACAP recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself