recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or another person and
addition, ACAP recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself or
. In addition, ACAP recorded the accounting documents with the documents related to such operations. Therefore, their actions were considered that they acted in order to obtain unlawful gains for himself
decoration equipment from Budget Ltd. and New Tique Ltd. to conceal expenses. It led to decrease of loss in the financial statements for Q1-Q2/2003 of DAIDO. Such actions misled DAIDO’s shareholders or any
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
inconsistency with normal market condition. In the scheme, Mr. Sun Dongvanpakdee and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing
normal market condition. In the scheme, Mr. Sun Dongvanpakdee and three other persons who entered the settlement procedure on January 22, 2014 aided or abetted the aforesaid actions by allowing others to