penalties under Section 296 of the SEA. He agreed to enter the criminal fining process and paid a fine of 4,333,480.50 baht.In addition, the criminal fine has caused Assavin to have untrustworthy
against them with the DSI for further legal proceedings.During the legal proceedings, {A} and {B} are deemed as having prohibited characteristics of capital market personnel and untrustworthy
Asset Management Co., Ltd.), has committed an offense with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for himself or another person by authorizing a mutual fund of Solaris Asset Management Co., Ltd. to
to support such policy? 3. Has the company's inspection ever revealed dishonest acts of its employees or executives? If so, how has the company dealt with such cases? And what are the company's
which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained
in which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
subsidiaries in which EA is a 99.99% shareholder (namely EA Solar Nakornsawan Company Limited (ESN) and EA Solar Lampang Company Limited (ESL)), jointly failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
deemed a dishonest act and caused damage to GGC at the total value of 2,157 million Baht. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 312 and 281/2 paragraph 2 in