client and acted irresponsible for the consequence of her action. The SEC probed into the case and found that {A} had made trading decision for such client in a manner that executing orders prior informing
percent of its shares in the manner that taking an advantage over other investors due to the use of negative non-public information material to {X1} share price. The said information was about {X1}'s Q1
SALEE shares from April 2 to October 9, 2007. The trading was in the manner that inflated and stabilized the share price as well as matched orders among those accounts. The transactions resulted in
found that on January 7, 2013, Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep had colluded to trade PERM shares through their own securities trading accounts. They continuously traded PERM shares in the manner that
found that on January 7, 2013, Sermkirt, Wichian and Pratheep had colluded to trade PERM shares through their own securities trading accounts. They continuously traded PERM shares in the manner that
November 13-16, 2007, Annop connived or agreed with Kamthorn to trade RS shares in a manner that inflated and stabilized the share price in concealment to mislead the public to believe in the artificially
November 13-16, 2007, Annop connived or agreed with Kamthorn to trade RS shares in a manner that inflated and stabilized the share price in concealment to mislead the public to believe in the artificially
continuous trading activities. Examples include sending trading orders in a manner that pushed prices upward, placing bid offers at multiple price levels in a way that obstructed and pressured other investors
continuous trading activities. Examples include sending trading orders in a manner that pushed prices upward, placing bid offers at multiple price levels in a way that obstructed and pressured other investors
Limited (THG) shares, demonstrating continuous trading activities. Examples include sending trading orders in a manner that pushed prices upward, placing bid offers at multiple price levels in a way that