issuer, SET or SEC to allow investors to make informed investment decision. As fact sheet is considered part of the registration statement, investors will be entitled to take legal action against DW issuer

securities. Otherwise, the SEC will strictly pursue legal action against such wrongdoing as insider trading deteriorates investors? trust as well as confidence in the capital market.?

such sanction; however, they refused to pay the civil penalty. Consequently, the SEC forwarded the case for the public attorney to bring a further legal action in the Civil Court. In this regard, a

Justice, Supreme Court.In the picture (from left to right):1. Mr. Panithi Phucharoen, Officer, the Litigation Department2. Ms. Siranuch Chalanonniwat, Officer, the Legal Department - Intermediaries3. Mr

Suppression Division of the Royal Thai Police for offenses liable to be unlicensed digital asset business operations under the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018) to pursue legal

the activities of the 16 exhibitors, which may constitute a legal violation, and gathered more evidence. If any activities liable to be in violation of the laws enforced by the SEC are found, a legal

penalties under Section 75 of the Emergency Decree. The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint with the CCIB for consideration of further legal action. In any case, filing a criminal complaint is

comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 26 February 2018, the public prosecutor filed a legal action against Surasak and Ekkamon with the Civil Court after the SEC had submitted the case for the Court

provided by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Securities and Futures Commission, Hong Kong (SFC) in gathering relevant facts and evidence which consequently help the SEC to pursue legal action on

cancellation and take legal action against those involved in the transactions.