Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. DV Act S.16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 23/06/2010
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the accused; however, attempt to
Mr. Todsapon Buachaiyo Mr. Todsapon Buachaiyo failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic
), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125. The public prosecutor ordered a non-prosecution order. DV Act S.Section 16 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 16/08/2017
Section 83 and Section 86 of the Criminal Code, as the case may be. Therefore, SEC has filed a criminal complaint against the said persons for ECSD to consider further legal action. Concurrently, SEC has
offenses and penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree. The SEC has therefore filed the criminal complaint against XT .COM with the ECD for consideration of further legal action. Following the
and subject to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA. Therefore, SEC has filed a criminal complaint against the said persons requesting ECSD to consider legal action. Concurrently, SEC has
of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht
everyday starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 30,000 and a