Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to transfer benefits to CSA
) Enter into Network Service Agreement with CSA, but then the Agreement was void because the court rendered final judgment that the Agreement was Mr. Katsuyuki's fictitious intention in order to
its revenue from providing mobile phone service during the subscribers protection period starting from its entering into the interim subscribers protection measure pursuant to the NBTC’s Notification on