likely to have effect on the price of PPPM’s stocks or the decision making on PPPM’s stocks investment. During the time of the offense, General Chaowarit Prapajit, Mr. Praween Deekajonedej, Miss

likely to have effect on the price of PPPM’s stocks or the decision making on PPPM’s stocks investment. During the time of the offense, General Chaowarit Prapajit, Mr. Praween Deekajonedej, Miss

likely to have effect on the price of PPPM’s stocks or the decision making on PPPM’s stocks investment. During the time of the offense, General Chaowarit Prapajit, Mr. Praween Deekajonedej, Miss

likely to have effect on the price of PPPM’s stocks or the decision making on PPPM’s stocks investment. During the time of the offense, General Chaowarit Prapajit, Mr. Praween Deekajonedej, Miss

their trading decisions without objection or asking for any information of those securities. In addition, it was found that a client of Onjira asked her to make trading decision on his behalf while Wasana

securities. In addition, it was found that a client of {B} asked her to make trading decision on his behalf while {C} submitted the client's securities trading orders via the internet from the IP address of

% compared to Q3/2018. Revenues from reduction of defaulted interest under the Court's order amount 16.66 Baht million. On September 25, 2019, the Appeal Court has modified decision by ordering the Company to

% compared to Q3/ 2017. Revenues from reduction of defaulted interest under the Court's order amount 16.66 Baht million. On September 25, 2019, the Appeal Court has modified decision by ordering the Company to

% compared to Q3/2018. Revenues from reduction of defaulted interest under the Court's order amount 16.66 Baht million. On September 25, 2019, the Appeal Court has modified decision by ordering the Company to

% compared to Q3/2018. Revenues from reduction of defaulted interest under the Court's order amount 16.66 Baht million. On September 25, 2019, the Appeal Court has modified decision by ordering the Company to