, had traded KARAT shares by using inside information before it was publicly disclosed on July 3, 2002. DSI later referred the case to public prosecutor who issued a prosecution order against Apichart
of the SEA. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.311 and Section 89/7 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17/11/2016
persons about the company’s financial position. - This case is under consideration of the supreme court. - The Attorney-General issued a supplementary prosecution order according to the Director
persons about the company’s financial position. - This case is under consideration of the supreme court. - The Attorney-General issued a supplementary prosecution order according to the Director
any persons about the company’s financial position. - This case is under consideration of the supreme court. - The Attorney-General issued a supplementary prosecution order according to the
prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial. SEC Act S.314 in conjunction with 307 311 312
. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal
issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code
prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was final. SEC Act S.Section 89/7 in conjunction with section 281/2 paragraph 2 307 311 312 313 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated
. Tharakorn Junkerd, (6) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final