business legally under the law of home country;? -?supervised by an IOSCO member regulator; -?not having a business premise in Thailand, except through shareholding in an SEC approved local CRA; and

? pre-determined investment scope.The proposed rules have taken into consideration the public?s and stakeholders? comments and suggestions collected from the hearing on the guiding principles in last

earlier collected from the hearing on the guiding principles in January this year. Further revisions were also made to facilitate introduction of diverse investment choices in response to investors? demands

pay there own costs and expenses.25/02/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement ordering the defendant to pay a sum of 333,333.33 Baht to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and

which is supervised by a regulator located in a country whose supervisory measures on investment management are recognized by the SEC Office; For the purpose of intermediaries’ compliance with the

supervised by a regulator located in a country whose supervisory measures on investment management are recognized by the SEC Office; For the purpose of intermediaries’ compliance with the aforesaid provision

also require that asset management companies disclose the types of fees collected from trigger funds more clearly, especially those different from the ones collected from other mutual funds with similar

fintech expo and found a number of business operators who may be liable to undertaking securities business, derivatives business or digital asset business without license. Additional evidence was collected

STPI collected an additional 2,212 million baht from its counterparty on top of the main contract. The said information was material to the STPI share price. This resulted in STPI?s Q1/2010 performance

from committing the offence since the date of the entry of the plaint until the defendant fully pays the said amount of money to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and ordering the