shares inconsistent with the normal market condition, to lure the public into the trading. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(2) in

financial statements for the year 2011 and the annual registration statement for the year 2011 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the

public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representative failed and the statute of limitations ran out. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed

financial statements for Q1/2013 to the SEC and the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged

., Ltd. in 2004. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial

the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 194,500 and a further fine of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56(4

250 each day starting from the next day of the prosecution date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 08/08/2014

the fines by half, resulting in fines of Baht 121,000 and a further fine of Baht 250 each day starting from the next day of the prosecution date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.300 Criminal

the year 2013 (Form 56-2, 2013) to the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender

year 2013 (Form 56-2, 2013) to the SET within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed