and derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the
derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the process of
and derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the
derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the process of
and derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the
and derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the
and derivative contracts. Consequently, the conduct of them affected the price or volume of EARTH shares and derivative contracts to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. This case is in the
period specified by the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board resulted from the instruction or the failure to give instruction which is duly required to be performed. This case is in the
digital asset dealer without a license during the mentioned period. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. DAB Act S.26 and Section 83 of Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an
WORLD. In addition, the acts mentioned above were assisted or facilitated by Ms. Chirawin. The public prosecutor issued a final non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.308 311 and