tricking the client to sign on a unit transfer order that was falsefully presented to the client as the subscription order for the units of the solicited fund.Niran's misconduct was deemed a failure to
- prior to the date of submitting the application, having been sentenced by the final judgement of a court for an offense related to property on the ground of acting in a manner of deceiving, cheating or
prior to the date of submitting the application, having been sentenced by the final judgement of a court for an offense related to property on the ground of acting in a manner of deceiving, cheating or
individuals accused of falsifying accounts and financial statements and deceiving the public* in the STARK case. In this regard, the public prosecutor reported the accused persons to the Court and
fees during February 1, 2000 - July 26, 2001. Their behaviors also indicated defrauding and deceiving the public by disseminating false information and concealing essential information through their
as Public Cheating and Fraud B.E. 2527 (1984), and reported the facts on the alleged offenses in accordance with the Law to the ECSD for further legal proceeding and relevant enforcement. The ECSD
10 years on account of deceiving several clients, falsifying documents, spending clients? money for his own interest, and using clients? trading accounts to trade securities for himself.Following a
evidence, complaints from 10 securities firms asking for legal actions against a number of persons, allegedly deceiving and defrauding the companies of the securities trading money, causing damage to the
made falsifying document deceiving this clients that the orders had been executed and claimed that the Automated Trading System (ATS) faced problems. He also deceived his clients to withdraw their