Earlier, Mr. Suphanan acting on behalf of IFEC sent a letter requesting the DBD to reveiw its order denying the registration of Mr. Wiphu Maharakkhaka and Mr. Manusak Deawwanich on IFEC directors’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the person concerned is notified and shall remain in effect until it is revoked or invalid for other re...

directed TIES to rectify its 2014 financial statements due to the auditor?s qualified opinion in relation to the construction cost reports for construction contracts not prepared in accordance with its

not lose the money if making investment decision on the advice. Furthermore, {A} failed to immediately submit orders to close out derivatives positions as directed by the client, causing the client to

accessibility. A concerted effort was also directed towards elevating investor awareness and education in the realm of bond investment. The overarching aim was to strengthen the credibility of the Thai bond

statements. Accordingly, TIES must submit to the SEC and publicly disclose the financial statements, urgently. Earlier, the SEC had directed TIES to rectify its 2014 financial statements due to the auditor’s

and steady. Additionally, ThaiBMA offers discount on bond registration fee.? Vorapol said. All businesses either listed or non-listed firms are welcome to join the project launching event, free of

. However, Mr. Suphanan failed to perform his duty as directed and submitted a clarification letter to the SEC. The SEC considered his explanation inadmissible. The SEC has viewed that Mr. Suphanan’s

Industry (Laos) Co., Ltd. of 50.10MB was included in year 2016. The company sustained steady progress in its make-over strategy into renewable Energy by acquiring another 30MW of solar farms in Thailand in

for milk and yogurt and consumer was in steady state. 2. The consolidated gross profit margin was 13.48%, decreased from the same period of last year at 15.43% due to increase in plastic resin cost

orders from such client. They just submitted trading orders as directed by {A}. Furthermore, they had never conducted KYC/CDD for the client because {A} prohibited them from doing so. Also, {B} received