% decrease and equivalent to the gross margin of 1.44 % and -1.12 %, respectively. The increase of gross margin was from gaining the reimbursed construction cost from the company’s joint venture of Baht 5.73

Discharge Type). These were because the global budgets set by the Social Security Office were insufficient to pay for all service fee reimbursed by the hospitals in the scheme. The Company therefore

(Translation) Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (As Amended) _________________ BHUMIBOL ADULYADEJ, REX., Given on the 12th day of March B.E. 2535; Being the 47th Year of the Present Reign. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej is graciously pleased to proclaim that: Whereas it is expedient to enact a law on the securities and exchange; Be it, therefore, enacted by His Majesty the King, by and with the advice and consent of the National Legislative Assembly functioning as both Houses of Parliam...

fee payment shall automatically be reimbursed to service users on a pro-rata basis in case of service termination by service users and fee for issuance of card or PIN replacement shall not be collected

decreased 9%. 2. Cost and expenses for the six-month period of 2017 was Baht 421.83 million increased by 6% compared to the same period of last year since the group compensated a voluntary resignation plan to

compensated a voluntary resignation plan to the employee. However, the Group recognized impairment loss of assets increased from the same period of 2017. Conclusion : The Group reported a loss for the first

price, which consequently caused damage to RAM primarily worth more than 300 million baht. He also received benefits from other relevant acts. Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in

, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid Mr.Bhusana with the money received from the share sale. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 89

Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid

Charuwan repaid Mr.Bhusana with the money received from the share sale. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 311 in conjunction with 315 Criminal