Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have

. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of

PRINCIPAL ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund | Offering Date : 12/10/2007 - 19/10/2007

UOB ASSET MANAGEMENT (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund,Retirement Mutual Fund : RMF | Offering Date : 24/11/2004 - 14/12/2004

UOB ASSET MANAGEMENT (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund | Offering Date : 08/10/2012 - 12/10/2012

PRINCIPAL ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund,Retirement Mutual Fund : RMF | Offering Date : 14/11/2005 - 28/11/2005

UOB ASSET MANAGEMENT (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund,Retirement Mutual Fund : RMF | Offering Date : 21/11/2005 - 09/12/2005

KIATNAKIN PHATRA ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund | Offering Date : 17/10/2007 - 31/10/2007

UOB ASSET MANAGEMENT (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund,Retirement Mutual Fund : RMF | Offering Date : 29/11/2006 - 19/12/2006

THAI ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED|Capital Protected Fund