Bangkok, February 21, 2012 - The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin, former Managing Director and

Bangkok, August 19, 2011 ? Vasant Thienhom, SEC Deputy Secretary-General stated concerning the Appeal Court?s today judgment that overturned the Court of First Instance on December 3, 2007 that

Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have

. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of

that he/she was just appointed as the lawyer and was attached to the court. Thus he/she would like to reconcile with the plaintiff first before the pleading. The court postponed the mediation to be on

that he/she was just appointed as the lawyer and was attached to the court. Thus he/she would like to reconcile with the plaintiff first before the pleading. The court postponed the mediation to be on

giving reasons that he/she was just appointed as the lawyer and was attached to the court. Thus he/she would like to reconcile with the plaintiff first before the pleading. The court postponed the

until the payment is fully completed, and Ekkamon to pay 333,333.33 baht. Both monetary penalties shall be submitted as state revenue. On 26 May 2020, the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the

violation of Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. On October 7, 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 10 years in prison. The defendant exercised the right to appeal. The

Clause 3. Law on administrative procedure shall, mutatis mutandis, be applicable to a consideration and imposition of administrative sanction and consideration on an appeal against such imposition. Clause