firms and the audit work quality of listed companies.Senior Assistant Secretary-General Prakid Punyashthiti said: ?The overall results of the second-cycle inspection show continued improvement in the work

rendered a judgement in the Red Case No. Por. 5396/2562, wherein the defendant was required to pay (1) a civil penalty, 1.25 times the benefits that the defendant received or would have received from

information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27

improvement of audit quality, enhance the credibility of the financial reporting system in the Thai capital market, and strengthen the mechanism for investor protection. In addition, the proposed supervisory

material information which has not yet been disclosed to the public. 01/04/2020 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

's profit. 12/05/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht

agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht SEC Act (before the fifth

using material non- public information for Mr.Suwat's profit. 12/06/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :    

>20/07/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :     - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.30 Baht SEC Act

penalty from the Company’s engagement of contractor for factory waste disposal in the third quarter, and set provision for doubtful debts and other expenses from replacing the distributor in the fourth