appropriate amount of paid-up registered capital by taking into account the nature of business and associated risks can lighten the burdens of intermediaries, especially small-sized securities companies or

Appeal Court rendered a judgement* amending the Civil Court’s judgement, by requiring the defendant to pay (1) a civil penalty, twice the amount of the benefits that the defendant received or would have

. Por. 5964/2562. On 22 December 2020, the Appeal Court rendered the judgement,* opposing the Civil Court’s decision. In this regard, the defendant is required to pay civil penalty twice the amount of

until the payment is fully completed, and Ekkamon to pay 333,333.33 baht. Both monetary penalties shall be submitted as state revenue. On 26 May 2020, the Court of Appeal confirmed the judgment of the

Clause 3. Law on administrative procedure shall, mutatis mutandis, be applicable to a consideration and imposition of administrative sanction and consideration on an appeal against such imposition. Clause

action* can be another legal option for protecting investors? interest.Guest lectured by Appeal Court Judge Pongdej Wanichkittikul to stakeholders from listed companies, the Thai Investors Association and

violation of Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. On October 7, 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 10 years in prison. The defendant exercised the right to appeal. The

PowerPoint Presentation Procedure for Administrative Action and Appeal Filing Taking legal action(s) Administrative Action Civil Sanction Criminal Action Considering whether to constitute law

Acting in Concert as a Result of the Nature of a Relationship or Behaviour and Requirements Under Sections 246 and 247 (No. 2)

Acting in concert as a result of the nature of a relationship or behaviour and requirements under Sections 246 and 247