the client’s investment suitability test and ordered {B} to open a fund account under the client’s name as well as withdraw 1 million baht from the client’s savings account to buy such funds. {A
their misconduct in this case, SEC views that {A} and {B} both failed to perform duties or giving services with loyalty.* SEC has therefore suspended the approval as investment consultant for complex
coverage lapsed. Chalermwut’s wrongful acts against investors’ assets were liable to failure to perform duties or provide services with loyalty in accordance with the Notification of the Capital Market
committed offenses under Section 283 as well as Paragraph 3 and Paragraph 4 of Section 285bis of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), as amended by the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 5) B.E
. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under
authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation
ๆ เช่น - บัตรกำนัลดิจิทัล (digital voucher) คูปอง คะแนนสะสม (loyalty point) ทีอ่ยู่ในรูปแบบ โทเคนดิจิทัลบนระบบ digital ledger technology (DLT) หรือหน่วยอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ใด ๆ - บัตรคอนเสิร์ต บัตรชม
(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for themselves or another person which