company for 5 years, and as major shareholder of derivatives business operator for 10 years.   Due to the deficiencies in duty performance of Mr. King, SKFM was subject to violation of Section 117

punishment of those found to be in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act, the SEC said it has made good progress in examining many complaints. Investigations are on-going and more time is needed to

their misconduct in this case, SEC views that {A} and {B} both failed to perform duties or giving services with loyalty.* SEC has therefore suspended the approval as investment consultant for complex

coverage lapsed.  Chalermwut’s wrongful acts against investors’ assets were liable to failure to perform duties or provide services with loyalty in accordance with the Notification of the Capital Market

their profession duties with loyalty* by making unauthorized investment without client’s permission, and order or consent on making fake documents. While {B} failed to properly discharge his

. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under

authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation

Niche, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of

N.A.T. (Thailand) Company Limited N.A.T. (Thailand) Company Limited (N.A.T.) operated derivatives business without obtaining license from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003