Reasons of Adjustments by Financial Statement Preparers Financial statements preparers also provide opinion on the reasons of adjustments. They believe that 29% of the adjustments are from judgment about
, violating Section 301. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to one-year imprisonment. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
2019, the Civil Court passed a judgment in the Decided Case No. Por. 899/2562 ordering Surasak to pay 522,500 baht and a 7.5 percent annual interest of 22,500 baht, starting from the case filing date
consolidation of the acquired hotel business in Europe. 2) Revenue from the office for rent business of Baht 38.6 million from office building in London, U.K. 3) Other revenue of Baht 82.5 million, which grew by
further fine of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 27/01/2014
113,500 and a further fine of Baht 500 each day starting from the next day of the judgment date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated
173,000 baht. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 02/12/2003
Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank
Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank renting