21, 2017, the Criminal Fining Committee issued order no. 39/2017 imposing a fine of 202,200 Baht on AI Energy Public Company Limited as the inquiry official requested the case to be settled by the

imposing a fine of 202,200 Baht on Mr. Anurag Thareratanavibool as the inquiry official requested the case to be settled by the Criminal Fining Committee. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

period. On May 17, 2017, the Criminal Fining Committee issued order no. 32/2017 imposing a fine of 252,750 Baht on Asian Insulators Public Company Limited as the inquiry official requested the case to be

imposing a fine of 252,750 Baht on Mr. Thanit Thareratanavibool as the inquiry official requested the case to be settled by the Criminal Fining Committee. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

the civil sanctions. The SEC Office files the case with the civil court. The Court imposes civil sanctions. The Court dismisses the case Is the judgement appealed? The Appeal Court YES Imposing the

The Civil Sanction Committee passed a resolution imposing a civil sanction on Surasak and Ekkamon in the case of insider trading of GLOBAL shares on 22 August 2012; however, both persons refused to

complete, transparent, and timely IPO information for investors’ informed decision-making, the SEC aims to promote more timely information  disclosure without imposing an undue burden on the issuer. The SEC

for equity crowdfunding. Furthermore, in the case of ICOs, imposing the aggregate limit would not be an effective investor protection mechanism. This is because it would be very difficult to enforce and

the period of ten years. Owing to the fact that Nakul?s approval as fund manager was expired and he has not been in the capital market business recently, instead of imposing revocation order, the SEC

circumstances or hinder businesses or livelihoods, thus imposing unnecessary burdens on the public.