information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27
Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee decided to impose civil sanctions on Mr. Surin Banyongponglert in the case where he had sent trading orders of PICO shares in the manner of price manipulation. However, Surin did not agree to comply with the civil sanctions. Later, on 26 December 2018, the public prosecutor filed a lawsuit against Surin with the Civil Court, as requested by SEC, in order for the Court to impose the civil sanctions on Surin in the Black Case No. Por. 7563/2561 between S...
SEC has received a tip from an investor that a Facebook account named “Japhoon” (meaning Catching Stocks) may operate business without obtaining a license from SEC. After further investigation of evidence, SEC has found that Artit gave investment advice and solicited the general public to invest in securities and derivatives. In so doing, he used the Japhoon Facebook account as an advertising channel for learning courses on securities and derivatives investment and also used a Line group as a ch...
Bangkok, March 22, 2011? The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court sentenced Kittipat Yaoprukse to eight-year and 18-month imprisonment and a fine of 1,880,000 baht. On February 24, 2003, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against Roynet Plc. (Roynet) and Kittipat Yaoprukse for falsifying account to deceive other persons, recording false statement, concealing the report on buying and selling of securities, and using inside information for trading Roynet shares in violation of Section 300 with Section...
result, Chantip gained illegal benefits from such buying. Moreover, during 12 July – 10 August 2018, after Chantip knew negative non-public information that the operating results of UVAN in the second
., Ltd. in 2004. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial
the company. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the alleged offender escaped and an arrest warrant was issued to bring the alleged offender to trial
account of Preeya, his subordinate at the company, on 16 January 2018 and gained benefits from the sale before the net loss value of 610.83 million baht from the 2017 operating results was disclosed to
Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). - The SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender together with the others. The inquiry official informed the SEC to refile a separate criminal complaint
the Derivatives Act B.E.2546 (2003). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, the public prosecutor cannot bring the alleged offender to trial. DV Act