Mr. Vijchu Chantatub During 24 - 29 October 2018 and 13 November 2018, Mr. Vijchu Chantatub as a private fund manager, managed a private fund without honesty and care to preserve the interests of the
Section 133 Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 Section 133. The securities company shall manage a private fund with honesty and care to preserve the interests of the person who has authorized the
mining property rights over the two mines truly exist, (2) report the re-assessment results of the fair value of the mining property rights, and (3) disclose all clarifications via the SET Information
part or in full new and/or existing eligible Social Projects (see Use of Proceeds section) and which are aligned with the four core components of the SBP. Different types of Social Bonds exist in the
to (1) clarify whether the mining property rights over the two mines truly exist, (2) report the re-assessment results of the fair value of the mining property rights, and (3) disclose all
construction projects, despite the fact that the services did not exist, with intent to deceive other persons. The said action was in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992
that the applicant had transferred all shares of such company to a third party despite various factors indicating that the transaction may not exist. This would lead to incorrect and incomplete
. Different types of Green Bonds exist in the market. These are described in Appendix I. It is understood that certain eligible Green Projects may have social co-benefits, and that the classification of a use
principles: 1) Restorative by design: striving to be exemplary in environmental responsibility, helping to preserve, restore and regenerate the natural resources upon which it depends and doing so in harmony