Earlier, Mr. Suphanan acting on behalf of IFEC sent a letter requesting the DBD to reveiw its order denying the registration of Mr. Wiphu Maharakkhaka and Mr. Manusak Deawwanich on IFEC directors’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the person concerned is notified and shall remain in effect until it is revoked or invalid for other re...
wrongful gains, causing damage to International Engineering Public Company Limited (IEC) and arranged or allowed preparation of the company's accounting records to be inaccurate and inconsistent with
Mr. Saran Lertchareonwongsa Mr. Saran Lertchareonwongsa rendered assistance and support for Mr. Bhusana Premanode and Mr. Chanchai Khemvichien arranged or allowed preparation of International
directed TIES to rectify its 2014 financial statements due to the auditor?s qualified opinion in relation to the construction cost reports for construction contracts not prepared in accordance with its
, Wichai, as Chairman of the Board of Directors and both meetings, arranged for the election by means of cumulative voting despite knowing that such method was not allowed according to the company’s articles
. Later Mr. Sutin repaid Mr.Bhusana with the money received from the share sale. Mr. Saran arranged the documentation and the payment for Mr. Sutin. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special
statements. Accordingly, TIES must submit to the SEC and publicly disclose the financial statements, urgently. Earlier, the SEC had directed TIES to rectify its 2014 financial statements due to the auditor’s
not lose the money if making investment decision on the advice. Furthermore, {A} failed to immediately submit orders to close out derivatives positions as directed by the client, causing the client to
accessibility. A concerted effort was also directed towards elevating investor awareness and education in the realm of bond investment. The overarching aim was to strengthen the credibility of the Thai bond
. However, Mr. Suphanan failed to perform his duty as directed and submitted a clarification letter to the SEC. The SEC considered his explanation inadmissible. The SEC has viewed that Mr. Suphanan’s