On 22 September 2022, the Capital Market Supervisory Board Meeting No. 10/2565 passed a resolution approving the proposed amendments to the regulations related to establishment and relocation of offices or branches of business operators in accordance with the Regulatory Guillotine to increase flexibility and streamline processes and operating burdens on the business sector. Essentially, the proposed amendments would: (1) apply the same auto approval principles for the establishment of...
? pre-determined investment scope.The proposed rules have taken into consideration the public?s and stakeholders? comments and suggestions collected from the hearing on the guiding principles in last
's profit. 12/05/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows : - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht
agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows : - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.33 Baht SEC Act (before the fifth
using material non- public information for Mr.Suwat's profit. 12/06/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :
>20/07/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows : - a civil monetary penalty of 333,333.30 Baht SEC Act
material information which has not yet been disclosed to the public. 01/04/2020 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows :
stemmed from the decrease in sugar prices and cost of production. Since the 1st quarter of 2017, the Company had been relocating its production lines of sauces and condiments to the new factory, such
resolutions as follows; 1. Determined the schedule of the Extraordinary General Meeting of the Shareholders No. 1/2017 (“EGM No. 1/2017”) on Monday, November 13, 2017 at 2.00 p.m., which will be held at 3rd
Settlement Committee. Mr. Somchai paid the fine as determined by the Settlement Committee order no. 8/2016, March 16, 2016. This case is regarded as settled. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and