individuals accused of falsifying accounts and financial statements and deceiving the public* in the STARK case. In this regard, the public prosecutor reported the accused persons to the Court and
fees during February 1, 2000 - July 26, 2001. Their behaviors also indicated defrauding and deceiving the public by disseminating false information and concealing essential information through their
10 years on account of deceiving several clients, falsifying documents, spending clients? money for his own interest, and using clients? trading accounts to trade securities for himself.Following a
evidence, complaints from 10 securities firms asking for legal actions against a number of persons, allegedly deceiving and defrauding the companies of the securities trading money, causing damage to the
made falsifying document deceiving this clients that the orders had been executed and claimed that the Automated Trading System (ATS) faced problems. He also deceived his clients to withdraw their
- prior to the date of submitting the application, having been sentenced by the final judgement of a court for an offense related to property on the ground of acting in a manner of deceiving, cheating or
deceiving investors and creditors into believing that that EARTH’s debt was greater than its assets, which constituted an offense under Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), The
. Such acts were done by falsifying documents relating to the trading of investment units of funds and documents relating to cash withdrawals, with the intention of deceiving clients that the investment
prior to the date of submitting the application, having been sentenced by the final judgement of a court for an offense related to property on the ground of acting in a manner of deceiving, cheating or