from the Bank’s electronic trading system, thus causing damage to clients. Details of the misconduct are as follow: (1) In the case of {A}, she was found to fail to examine the correctness of
easy to understand, including details on forecast and risks which may cause the return or the fund’s performance to be different from estimated; and 2. projection of rental income which is certified by a
following information: 1. key assumption applied which is clear and easy to understand, including details on forecast and risks which may cause the return or the fund’s performance to be different from
, including details on forecast and risks which may cause the return or the fund’s performance to be different from estimated; and 2. projection of rental income which is certified by a property valuer approved
is clear and easy to understand, including details on forecast and risks which may cause the return or the fund’s performance to be different from estimated; and 2. projection of rental income which is
understand, including details on forecast and risks which may cause the return or the fund’s performance to be different from estimated; and 2. projection of rental income which is certified by a property
expenses of the mutual fund which includes the following information: 1. key assumption applied which is clear and easy to understand, including details on forecast and risks which may cause the return or
has arranged for; (1) a process by which the trust manager or its agent may examine or verify the correctness of the income contractually entitled to the trust; (2) a covenant to deliver a report or
notification of the Office and shall keep the supporting documents which evidence the correctness of such account. In managing a private fund of the nature specified by the notification of the Office, the