paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the
penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the audited financial statements for the year 2012, the Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 20,000 Baht and a
provisions regarding the employees’ savings and the employer’s contribution payable to the fund; (7) the provisions regarding the rules and procedures for the computation of benefits entitled to the employees
penalties under Section 57 and Section 66 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The first count of unlicensed offering of digital tokens is liable to imprisonment for a term not
Rassarin) were each convicted on 9 counts with a total of 10-year and 54-month imprisonment and a fine of 1,256,000 baht; Budget Management and Design Co., Ltd. was convicted on one count with a fine of
documents, or made incomplete or incorrect accounts, she shall be liable to 5-year imprisonment for each count for 122 counts. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the court reduced the punishments by half
physical count of inventories of company and subsidiary as at December 31, 2016 by DIA International Audit. The Company net profit of 332.37 million baht which increase 253.44 million bath or 321% by
guilty, the penalties were reduced by half to the imprisonment of one year. Later, the Appeal Court adjudicated to count the prison sentence for the 1st defendant (Mr. Pornthep) following the red number
penalties were reduced by half to the imprisonment of one year. Later, the Appeal Court adjudicated to count the prison sentence for the 1st defendant (Mr. Pornthep) following the red number 1004/2561, 3300