Complex Type 2 Investment Consultant
sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead the public and investors about
lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could materially mislead
been fully utilized. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information
. Furthermore, STARK lacked retained earnings or sufficient liquidity to carry out the share repurchase project as disclosed. Such act was deemed a dissemination of false information or details that could
exemption are as follows: (1) Rules that carry the material context similar to that stated in the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 or the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 or the regulations
). Also, helping SMEs to access funds in the capital market and use the proceeds to develop and increase their competitiveness in the industry as well as providing SMEs with sufficient liquidity to carry
suffer loss.Failure to give proper investment advices on generally accepted professional standards, guarantee returns from investment and failure to carry out order of the client were in violation of the